BudibaseBuild AI agents, chat and automate internal workflows instantly.
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Budibase vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Budibase is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 5.2 versus 3.6 for Supabase.
Choose Budibase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.2 vs 3.6)
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $25)
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 18% positive)
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
Choose Supabase if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Budibase | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.2% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.5% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #20 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Budibase −0.5pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Budibase leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
BudibaseSupabase
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Budibase ranked higher
0Supabase ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Budibase | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-host on your own infrastructure or use Budibase Cloud | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Community forum, docs and chat, Email support on Business plan, Priority SLAs and account manager on Enterprise | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Belfast, Northern Ireland | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Seed (about $1.8M, before Seed II) · $9M raised | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | IT and operations teams in regulated organizations that want agents, apps and automations they can self-host. | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
Budibase
Pro$19month
Premium$49month
Business$299month
Enterprise (Cloud)Customcustom
Open source$0free (self-host)
Enterprise (Self-host)Customcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Budibase
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
- transparent, predictable pricing
- free with no user limit
- low-code tool for internal tools, admin panels and dashboards
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Budibase vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/budibase-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.