CareerBuilder vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 1.5 for CareerBuilder, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose CareerBuilder if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 44% positive)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- multi-channel job distribution
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 1.5)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CareerBuilder | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #45 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CareerBuilder 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | CareerBuilder | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | Perplexity | #4 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CareerBuilder | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 270+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | — | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 1995 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | — | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Venture round led by New Enterprise Associates | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | — | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
CareerBuilder
Pricing not available.
Workable
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CareerBuilder
- multi-channel job distribution
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CareerBuilder vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/careerbuilder-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.