Skip to content
SlateIndex
AshbyAll-in-one recruiting software for ambitious teams
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Ashby vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 17.4 for Ashby, and ranks ahead in 30% of the answers that name both.

Choose Ashby if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 44% positive)
  • Deep data visibility
  • Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
  • Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 17.4)
  • You want a lower entry price ($299 vs $400)
  • You need more native integrations (270+ vs 250+)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 3 coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Ashby Workable
Visibility score17.4%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#7#2
Share of voice3.8%7.2%
Mentions this run2138
Positive in AI answers57%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Ashby 17%

Ashby 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
23.3%
34.1%
AI Mode
8.2%
29.4%
Perplexity
20.7%
26.7%
AshbyWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

20 engine answers name both brands

14Ashby ranked higher
6Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAshbyWorkable
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry price$400 / mo$299 / mo
Free planNoNo · 15-day trial
DeploymentCloud-hosted software as a service on Amazon Web Services, sold on subscription plansCloud-based SaaS
Integrations250+270+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportCustomer success teamPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20182012
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees201–500201–500
FundingSeries D · $120M raisedSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forAmbitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiringCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

Ashby

All-In-One Foundations$400month
All-In-One PlusCustomcontact sales
All-In-One EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Ashby AnalyticsCustomusage-based
Ashby pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Ashby

  • Deep data visibility
  • Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
  • Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
  • Good for data-driven recruiting teams
  • Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software

    Workable

    • fast deployment and ease of use
    • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
    • transparent pricing and free trial
    • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
    • candidate sourcing
    • costs more than lightweight ATS options

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ashby vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ashby-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.