Skip to content
SlateIndex
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Greenhouse vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 30.1 for Workable, and ranks ahead in 68% of the answers that name both.

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 30.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 44% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

Choose Workable if…

  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
  • transparent pricing and free trial

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Greenhouse Workable
Visibility score38.5%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#1#2
Share of voice8.1%7.2%
Mentions this run4338
Positive in AI answers56%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Greenhouse 39%

Greenhouse 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43.5%
34.1%
AI Mode
33.5%
29.4%
Perplexity
38.3%
26.7%
GreenhouseWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

25 engine answers name both brands

17Greenhouse ranked higher
8Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGreenhouseWorkable
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry priceContact sales$299 / mo
Free planNoNo · 15-day trial
Deployment—Cloud-based SaaS
Integrations—270+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSSISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
Support—Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20122012
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees501–1,000201–500
FundingSeries D · $110M raisedSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Greenhouse

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

    Workable

    • fast deployment and ease of use
    • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
    • transparent pricing and free trial
    • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
    • candidate sourcing
    • costs more than lightweight ATS options

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.