Skip to content
SlateIndex
LeverModern recruiting software that combines ATS and CRM capabilities
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Lever vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 22.2 for Lever, and ranks ahead in 46% of the answers that name both.

Choose Lever if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
  • Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
  • Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 22.2)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Lever Workable
Visibility score22.2%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#3#2
Share of voice6.3%7.2%
Mentions this run3438
Positive in AI answers44%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Lever 22%

Lever 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
25%
34.1%
AI Mode
17.4%
29.4%
Perplexity
24.3%
26.7%
LeverWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

26 engine answers name both brands

14Lever ranked higher
12Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLeverWorkable
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$299 / mo
Free plan—No · 15-day trial
Deployment—Cloud-based SaaS
Integrations—270+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportCustomer Support, Phone (888) 885-5299Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20122012
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CABoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees—201–500
FundingSeries DSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forSmall, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations.Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

Lever

Pricing not available.

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Lever

  • Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
  • Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
  • Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies

    Workable

    • fast deployment and ease of use
    • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
    • transparent pricing and free trial
    • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
    • candidate sourcing
    • costs more than lightweight ATS options

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Lever vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/lever-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.