CeloxisEnterprise project and portfolio management in one execution platform.
vs
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Celoxis vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 7.2 versus 4.6 for Celoxis, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Celoxis if…
- You need AICPA SOC 2 Type 2 or EU GDPR or UK GDPR coverage
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.2 vs 4.6)
- You need more native integrations (3500+ vs 400+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (41% vs 25% positive)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Celoxis | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 7.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #17 | #13 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 1.8% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Celoxis 0pp · Make 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CeloxisMake
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Celoxis ranked higher
2Make ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Celoxis | Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are common mistakes when buying a project management tool? | ChatGPT | #3 | #2 |
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | Perplexity | #8 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Celoxis | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $10 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud or on-premise | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | 400+ | 3500+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, AICPA SOC 2 Type 2, EU GDPR, UK GDPR | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | 24x5 support with real people, Standard, Premium and VIP support tiers by plan, Dedicated account manager through rollout | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2001 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Pune, India | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Best for | PMOs and project-driven teams that need to manage portfolios, resources, budgets and risks together. | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Plans side by side
Celoxis
Core$10per Standard user per month, billed annually
Essentials$25per Standard user per month, billed annually
Professional$35per Standard user per month, billed annually
Business$45per Standard user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Make
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Celoxis
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Celoxis vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/celoxis-vs-make, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.