CeloxisEnterprise project and portfolio management in one execution platform.
vs
PlanviewStrategic Portfolio Management & Software Delivery Solutions
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Celoxis vs Planview
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Celoxis is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 4.6 versus 4 for Planview, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Celoxis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.6 vs 4)
- You need ISO 27001 or AICPA SOC 2 Type 2 or EU GDPR or UK GDPR coverage
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Choose Planview if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (86% vs 25% positive)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Gold standard for massive enterprises
- Robust resource capacity planning and financial tracking
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Celoxis | Planview |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #17 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 86% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Celoxis 0pp · Planview 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Celoxis leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CeloxisPlanview
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Celoxis ranked higher
2Planview ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Celoxis | Planview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Project Management vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #8 | #2 |
| Official website of the top project management tool vendors | ChatGPT | #16 | #15 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Celoxis | Planview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $10 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud or on-premise | — |
| Integrations | 400+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, AICPA SOC 2 Type 2, EU GDPR, UK GDPR | — |
| Support | 24x5 support with real people, Standard, Premium and VIP support tiers by plan, Dedicated account manager through rollout | Customer Success Center, Submit a ticket |
| Founded | 2001 | 1989 |
| Headquarters | Pune, India | Austin, TX, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | Growth round (led by Insight Partners) · $25M raised |
| Best for | PMOs and project-driven teams that need to manage portfolios, resources, budgets and risks together. | — |
Plans side by side
Celoxis
Core$10per Standard user per month, billed annually
Essentials$25per Standard user per month, billed annually
Professional$35per Standard user per month, billed annually
Business$45per Standard user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Planview
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Celoxis
- Portfolio planning and scenario analysis
- Strong ratings in some comparison research
Planview
- Gold standard for massive enterprises
- Robust resource capacity planning and financial tracking
- Strong traditional project portfolio management
- Recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
- Suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Celoxis vs Planview”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/celoxis-vs-planview, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.