Cisco Duo vs Keycloak
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cisco Duo is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 16.5 versus 5.6 for Keycloak, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Cisco Duo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.5 vs 5.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 33% positive)
- You need FedRAMP High (Duo Federal) or FedRAMP Moderate (Duo Federal) or GovRAMP or TX-RAMP or FIPS 140-3 coverage
- Low-friction, reliable MFA
Choose Keycloak if…
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cisco Duo | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16.5% | 5.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | down−0.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #6 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 2.1% |
| Mentions this run | 14 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cisco Duo +0.10000000000000142pp · Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cisco Duo leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Cisco Duo | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular identity and access management platform | Perplexity | #5 | #8 |
| Most affordable identity and access management platform that is still reliable | Perplexity | #4 | #5 |
| Is there a free identity and access management platform for small teams? | Perplexity | #3 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cisco Duo | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $3 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability |
| Integrations | 500+ | — |
| Compliance | FedRAMP High (Duo Federal), FedRAMP Moderate (Duo Federal), GovRAMP, TX-RAMP, FIPS 140-3 | — |
| Support | Technical documentation, Knowledge base, Community | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Ann Arbor, MI, United States | — |
| Funding | Venture Round | — |
| Best for | Organizations from small businesses to enterprises and government that want phishing-resistant MFA and simple IAM. | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications |
Plans side by side
Cisco Duo
Keycloak
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cisco Duo
- Low-friction, reliable MFA
- Zero Trust device trust and endpoint visibility
- Phishing-resistant MFA, SSO, and device trust
- Free tier for up to 10 users
- Highest PeerSpot rating among access-management products
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cisco Duo vs Keycloak”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cisco-duo-vs-keycloak, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.