Skip to content
SlateIndex
Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
vs
KissflowAI-powered enterprise no-code and low-code platform.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

Claris FileMaker vs Kissflow

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Kissflow is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.

Choose Claris FileMaker if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage

Choose Kissflow if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 1.6)
  • You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or HIPAA or GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • rapid business process automation
  • conversational and agentic AI app generation

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Claris FileMaker Kissflow
Visibility score1.6%7.7%
Change vs last weekNewdown−5%
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#37#13
Share of voice0.3%2.3%
Mentions this run213
Positive in AI answers—17%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Claris FileMaker 2%

Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · Kissflow −4.999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Kissflow leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.1%
3%
AI Mode
0%
5%
Perplexity
3.7%
15%
Claris FileMakerKissflow

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
0Kissflow ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionClaris FileMakerKissflow
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry price$22 per seat / mo—
Free planNo—
DeploymentCloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server)Public and private cloud hosting
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA
SupportTechnical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forumsDedicated support throughout transformation, Training and enablement for teams, Hands-on implementation
Founded20192003
HeadquartersSunnyvale, CaliforniaWilmington, Delaware, United States
Employees201–500201–500
FundingLater Stage VC · $1M raisedAngel · $1M raised
Best forTeams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprisesLarge enterprises and IT teams that build and govern custom internal apps on one platform.

Plans side by side

Claris FileMaker

Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Claris FileMaker pricing

Kissflow

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Claris FileMaker

Profile in progress.

Kissflow

  • rapid business process automation
  • conversational and agentic AI app generation
  • unified enterprise process automation
  • ease-of-use with structured workflow governance
  • highly rated by business technologists and process owners

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs Kissflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-kissflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.