Claris FileMaker vs OutSystems
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 40.2 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.2 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or GDPR or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 40.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−2.5% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 8.2% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 47 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · OutSystems −2.3999999999999986pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Claris FileMaker | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #7 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | — |
| Founded | 2019 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | Series F, led by KKR |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
OutSystems
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.