Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
vs
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Claris FileMaker vs Supabase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Supabase is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You want a lower entry price ($22 vs $25)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Supabase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 3.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 18% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · Supabase +3.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Supabase leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Claris FileMakerSupabase
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
0Supabase ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | Hosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open source |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available) |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | Community support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan) |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | Remote-first, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | Series D · $1000M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Teams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backend |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Supabase
- Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
- Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
- Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
- Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
- Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs Supabase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-supabase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.