ClearCompany vs hireEZ
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
hireEZ is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 2.5 versus 0.3 for ClearCompany, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose ClearCompany if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose hireEZ if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.5 vs 0.3)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ClearCompany | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 2.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #67 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 29% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ClearCompany 0pp · hireEZ 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
hireEZ leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | ClearCompany | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #26 | #21 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ClearCompany | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $494 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 7-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-native, multi-tenant SaaS hosted within Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Layered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks. |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Professional services packages (ClearCare) including concierge support and talent coaching, Collaborative partner support for integrations | — |
| Founded | — | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Lewiston, Maine, United States | Mountain View, California, US |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Acquisition financing with Gemspring Capital · $60M raised | Series C |
| Best for | Fast-growing scale-ups to established enterprises that want hiring connected to performance, learning and retention | Enterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out. |
Plans side by side
ClearCompany
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ClearCompany
Profile in progress.
hireEZ
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
- AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
- per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ClearCompany vs hireEZ”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clearcompany-vs-hireez, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.