ClearCompany vs Greenhouse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 0.3 for ClearCompany, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose ClearCompany if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or CCPA coverage
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ClearCompany | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 38.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #67 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 8.1% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 43 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ClearCompany 0pp · Greenhouse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | ClearCompany | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #26 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ClearCompany | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-native, multi-tenant SaaS hosted within Amazon Web Services (AWS) | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS |
| Support | Professional services packages (ClearCare) including concierge support and talent coaching, Collaborative partner support for integrations | — |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Lewiston, Maine, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Acquisition financing with Gemspring Capital · $60M raised | Series D · $110M raised |
| Best for | Fast-growing scale-ups to established enterprises that want hiring connected to performance, learning and retention | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises |
Plans side by side
ClearCompany
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ClearCompany
Profile in progress.
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ClearCompany vs Greenhouse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clearcompany-vs-greenhouse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.