ClerkAuthentication and user management for modern web apps
vs
CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Clerk vs CyberArk
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 3.1 for Clerk.
Choose Clerk if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 49% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR (EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework) coverage
- Free user management up to 1,000,000 MAUs
- Clear, modular per-connection pricing
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 3.1)
- You need SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or IRAP or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clerk | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.1% | 15.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.6% | up+2.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #22 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 1.3% | 6.1% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 19 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 49% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clerk +0.6000000000000001pp · CyberArk +0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClerkCyberArk
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clerk ranked higher
0CyberArk ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clerk | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Self-hosted and SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, GDPR (EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework), CCPA | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Community Discord, Email support, Priority support, Dedicated technical account manager | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community |
| Founded | 2019 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Newton, MA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $101M raised | Post-IPO debt |
| Best for | Developers building React and Next.js apps who want prebuilt auth and user management, including B2B SaaS needing organizations and SSO | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. |
Plans side by side
Clerk
Hobby$0month
Pro$25month ($20/mo billed annually)
Business$300month ($250/mo billed annually)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, billed annually
CyberArk
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clerk
- Free user management up to 1,000,000 MAUs
- Clear, modular per-connection pricing
- Rapid development and developer experience
- Expanded support for B2B organizations and multi-tenancy
- Good fit for rapid MVP builds
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clerk vs CyberArk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clerk-vs-cyberark, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.