Clerk vs Keeper Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Clerk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 3.1 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security.
Choose Clerk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.1 vs 0.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 0% positive)
- You need GDPR (EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework) or CCPA coverage
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 3 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clerk | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.1% | 0.5% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.6% | down−0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #22 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 1.3% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clerk +0.6000000000000001pp · Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Clerk leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clerk | Keeper Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, GDPR (EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework), CCPA | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe |
| Support | Community Discord, Email support, Priority support, Dedicated technical account manager | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University |
| Founded | 2019 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Chicago, Illinois, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $101M raised | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised |
| Best for | Developers building React and Next.js apps who want prebuilt auth and user management, including B2B SaaS needing organizations and SSO | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform |
Plans side by side
Clerk
Keeper Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clerk
- Free user management up to 1,000,000 MAUs
- Clear, modular per-connection pricing
- Rapid development and developer experience
- Expanded support for B2B organizations and multi-tenancy
- Good fit for rapid MVP builds
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clerk vs Keeper Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clerk-vs-keeper-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.