Skip to content
SlateIndex
ClerkAuthentication and user management for modern web apps
vs
OmadaA Leader In Identity Governance and Administration
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Clerk vs Omada

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Clerk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 3.1 versus 0.6 for Omada.

Choose Clerk if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.1 vs 0.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 0% positive)
  • You need HIPAA or GDPR (EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework) or CCPA coverage
  • Free user management up to 1,000,000 MAUs

Choose Omada if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 3 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
  • Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Clerk Omada
Visibility score3.1%0.6%
Change vs last weekup+1.6%up+0.6%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#22#34
Share of voice1.3%0.3%
Mentions this run41
Positive in AI answers56%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Clerk 3%

Clerk +0.6000000000000001pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Clerk leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.1%
2.3%
AI Mode
3.7%
0%
Perplexity
2.4%
1.1%
ClerkOmada

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Clerk ranked higher
0Omada ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionClerkOmada
Pricing modelUsage-based—
Entry priceFree; paid from $25 / mo—
Free planYes—
DeploymentCloud (SaaS)SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, GDPR (EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework), CCPAISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3
SupportCommunity Discord, Email support, Priority support, Dedicated technical account managerCustomer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services
Founded20192000
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesCopenhagen, Denmark
Employees51–200201–500
FundingSeries C · $101M raisedMajority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital)
Best forDevelopers building React and Next.js apps who want prebuilt auth and user management, including B2B SaaS needing organizations and SSORegulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration

Plans side by side

Clerk

Hobby$0month
Pro$25month ($20/mo billed annually)
Business$300month ($250/mo billed annually)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, billed annually
Clerk pricing

Omada

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Clerk

  • Free user management up to 1,000,000 MAUs
  • Clear, modular per-connection pricing
  • Rapid development and developer experience
  • Expanded support for B2B organizations and multi-tenancy
  • Good fit for rapid MVP builds

    Omada

    • Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
    • Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clerk vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clerk-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.