Skip to content
SlateIndex
ClientPointSell smarter, close faster.
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

ClientPoint vs Qwilr

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 0 for ClientPoint.

Choose ClientPoint if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

Choose Qwilr if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 0)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
  • Interactive, web-based proposals
  • Polished, visually striking proposal presentation

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric ClientPoint Qwilr
Visibility score0%28.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#47#4
Share of voice0%7.2%
Mentions this run037
Positive in AI answers—51%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2ClientPoint 0%

ClientPoint 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
30.2%
AI Mode
0%
26.9%
Perplexity
0%
27.8%
ClientPointQwilr

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0ClientPoint ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionClientPointQwilr
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—$35 per seat / mo
Free plan—No · 14-day trial
DeploymentWeb-based, accessed through an internet browser without installing softwareWeb-based, web-native software
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS
SupportLive chat, weekdays 8am to 8pm ET, Phone: 888-972-7375, Email: support@clientpoint.netEmail support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions
Founded20092014
HeadquartersCarlsbad, California, United StatesRedfern, New South Wales, Australia
Employees51–20051–200
FundingOther InvestorsSeries A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised
Best forSales, marketing and client success teams at businesses of all sizes, from small businesses to enterprises, that send proposals and manage buyer relationships.Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement.

Plans side by side

ClientPoint

Pricing not available.

Qwilr

Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Qwilr pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

ClientPoint

Profile in progress.

Qwilr

  • Interactive, web-based proposals
  • Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
  • Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
  • Lower cost with annual billing
  • 14-day free trial available

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “ClientPoint vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clientpoint-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.