ClineAI Coding, Open Source and Open Choice
vs
ZedThe world's fastest IDE. Open source. AI optional.
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Cline vs Zed
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cline is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 1 for Zed, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Cline if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (54% vs 50% positive)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Open-source with bring-your-own API key
Choose Zed if…
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
- Works with VS Code and JetBrains
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Cline | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #16 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 2.6% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Cline 0pp · Zed 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cline leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClineZed
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Cline ranked higher
1Zed ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Cline | Zed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | ChatGPT | #17 | #16 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Cline | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Runs in your editor, terminal or own apps, with local or cloud AI models, and VPC deployments on Enterprise. | Desktop editor on Windows, macOS and Linux, with remote development over SSH, WSL and dev containers. Users can run local Ollama models, and API keys for hosted providers are kept on the local machine. |
| Support | Community support for the open-source version, Priority and dedicated support on Enterprise, SLA on Enterprise | — |
| Founded | — | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Boulder, Colorado |
| Employees | 11–50 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Seed · $32M raised | Series B · $42M raised |
| Best for | Individual developers and teams who want an open-source agent with their own provider keys, and organizations that need SSO, audit logs and team management on Enterprise. | Developers who want a fast editor with AI optional, and teams that need org-level control over AI features and data sharing through the Business plan. |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Cline
- Open-source with bring-your-own API key
- Granular model control and choice of models
- Reliable handling of large codebase modifications
- Free, flexible setup
- Fits strict privacy and compliance needs with approved models
- Team must pay model-token API costs
Zed
- Ideal for small teams already on GitHub
- Works with VS Code and JetBrains
- Heavy usage requires a paid plan upgrade
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cline vs Zed”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cline-vs-zed, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.