Concord vs Oneflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Oneflow is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 16.1 versus 3.6 for Concord, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Concord if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions or GDPR or CSA STAR Level One coverage
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
Choose Oneflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.1 vs 3.6)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or SOC 1 Type 1 or SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
- Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
- Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Concord | Oneflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 16.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #20 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 4.9% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 27 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 32% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Concord 0pp · Oneflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Oneflow leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Concord | Oneflow |
|---|---|---|---|
| How long does it take to roll out a proposal and contract tool? | Perplexity | #4 | #3 |
| Is there a free proposal and contract tool for small teams? | Perplexity | #4 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Concord | Oneflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $499 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | SaaS |
| Integrations | 5000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions, GDPR, CSA STAR Level One | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, SOC 1 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 1 |
| Support | Self-serve knowledge base, Email support, Live training webinars, Priority customer support | Dedicated onboarding in the Enterprise tier |
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, US | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $39M raised | Private investment of SEK 20 million from Mattias Ståhlgren |
| Best for | Mid-sized companies in healthcare, tech, professional services and financial services, especially those where business teams create and track contracts outside legal. | Teams of all shapes and sizes that need to handle their contracts |
Plans side by side
Concord
Oneflow
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Concord
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
- less proposal-oriented
Oneflow
- Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
- Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
- Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards
- Proposal-to-contract workflow turning interactive proposals into live contracts
- Strong for contract management, with online signing and post-signature tracking
- Interactive proposals and editable contracts require a paid plan
- Smaller review coverage and pricing generally targets larger teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concord vs Oneflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concord-vs-oneflow, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.