ConcordContract Management You Don't Have to Manage
vs
Oracle CPQProposals & Contracts
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Concord vs Oracle CPQ
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Concord is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 0.3 for Oracle CPQ.
Choose Concord if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions or GDPR or CSA STAR Level One coverage
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
Choose Oracle CPQ if…
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- complex product configuration
- pricing capabilities
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Concord | Oracle CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #20 | #46 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Concord 0pp · Oracle CPQ 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Concord leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ConcordOracle CPQ
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Concord ranked higher
0Oracle CPQ ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Concord | Oracle CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $499 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Cloud-only, as part of Oracle Fusion Cloud |
| Integrations | 5000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions, GDPR, CSA STAR Level One | ISO 27001 |
| Support | Self-serve knowledge base, Email support, Live training webinars, Priority customer support | — |
| Founded | 2014 | — |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, US | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $39M raised | — |
| Best for | Mid-sized companies in healthcare, tech, professional services and financial services, especially those where business teams create and track contracts outside legal. | — |
Plans side by side
Concord
Essentials$499month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Business$899month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Enterprise$1,299month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Oracle CPQ
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Concord
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
- less proposal-oriented
Oracle CPQ
- complex product configuration
- pricing capabilities
- guided-selling proposals
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concord vs Oracle CPQ”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concord-vs-oracle-cpq, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.