Oracle CPQ vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 0.3 for Oracle CPQ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Oracle CPQ if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 51% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- complex product configuration
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Oracle CPQ | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 28.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #46 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 37 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Oracle CPQ 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Oracle CPQ | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #10 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Oracle CPQ | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-only, as part of Oracle Fusion Cloud | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | — | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | — | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | — | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Oracle CPQ
Pricing not available.
Qwilr
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Oracle CPQ
- complex product configuration
- pricing capabilities
- guided-selling proposals
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Oracle CPQ vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/oracle-cpq-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.