ConcordContract Management You Don't Have to Manage
vs
SigneasySign effortlessly, manage contracts intelligently.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Concord vs Signeasy
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Concord is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 0.7 for Signeasy.
Choose Concord if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 0.7)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions or CSA STAR Level One coverage
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
Choose Signeasy if…
- You want a lower entry price ($10 vs $499)
- You need ESIGN & UETA or eIDAS or SOC 2 or HIPAA or 21 CFR Part 11 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Concord | Signeasy |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #20 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Concord 0pp · Signeasy 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Concord leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ConcordSigneasy
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Concord ranked higher
0Signeasy ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Concord | Signeasy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $499 per seat / mo | $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Web, mobile and API |
| Integrations | 5000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions, GDPR, CSA STAR Level One | ESIGN & UETA, eIDAS, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, 21 CFR Part 11 |
| Support | Self-serve knowledge base, Email support, Live training webinars, Priority customer support | Email support, Chat support, Priority support, Dedicated success manager |
| Founded | 2014 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, US | Dallas, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $39M raised | Series B |
| Best for | Mid-sized companies in healthcare, tech, professional services and financial services, especially those where business teams create and track contracts outside legal. | Teams that need eSignatures together with a contract repository and renewal tracking, such as finance, HR, sales, legal operations and IT. |
Plans side by side
Concord
Essentials$499month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Business$899month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Enterprise$1,299month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Signeasy
Personal$10month/seat
Business$20month/seat
Business Pro$30month/seat
Build Your Plan (eSign)Customcustom
ICM Core$45month/seat, minimum 3 seats
ICM Pro$60month/seat, minimum 3 seats
Build Your Plan (ICM)Customcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Concord
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
- less proposal-oriented
Signeasy
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concord vs Signeasy”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concord-vs-signeasy, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.