ConcordContract Management You Don't Have to Manage
vs
Upland QvidianAI-powered RFP response and proactive sales proposal creation software
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Concord vs Upland Qvidian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Concord is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.6 versus 1 for Upland Qvidian.
Choose Concord if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.6 vs 1)
- You need EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions or GDPR or CSA STAR Level One coverage
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
Choose Upland Qvidian if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Concord | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #20 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Concord 0pp · Upland Qvidian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Concord leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ConcordUpland Qvidian
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Concord ranked higher
0Upland Qvidian ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Concord | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $499 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Integrations | 5000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions, GDPR, CSA STAR Level One | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Self-serve knowledge base, Email support, Live training webinars, Priority customer support | — |
| Founded | 2014 | — |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, US | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $39M raised | Series B · $31M raised |
| Best for | Mid-sized companies in healthcare, tech, professional services and financial services, especially those where business teams create and track contracts outside legal. | Sales teams that respond to RFPs and build sales proposals |
Plans side by side
Concord
Essentials$499month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Business$899month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Enterprise$1,299month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Upland Qvidian
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Concord
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
- less proposal-oriented
Upland Qvidian
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concord vs Upland Qvidian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concord-vs-upland-qvidian, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.