Concourse CIConcourse is an open-source continuous thing-doer.
vs
DockerRun AI agents and containers safely, anywhere.
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
Concourse CI vs Docker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Docker is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 17.2 versus 0.6 for Concourse CI.
Choose Concourse CI if…
- No licensing fees when self-hosted
Choose Docker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.2 vs 0.6)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout or ISO 27001 certification or ISO 27701 certified privacy program coverage
- Broad support for Docker and Kubernetes workflows
- Reliable for containerized, Docker-based workflows
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Concourse CI | Docker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.6% | 17.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #30 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 4.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 27 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 6% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Concourse CI 0pp · Docker 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Docker leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Concourse CIDocker
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Concourse CI ranked higher
0Docker ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Concourse CI | Docker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $11 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Distributed as a single concourse binary, easy to run almost anywhere, especially with Docker. | Local and Docker-managed cloud |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2 attestation for Docker Hub and Scout, ISO 27001 certification, ISO 27701 certified privacy program |
| Support | — | Community forums and Community Slack, Support tickets with 5, 2 or 1 business day response SLAs by plan, Premium Support and TAM add-on with 24x7 response |
| Founded | — | 2013 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | — | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | — | Funding round |
| Best for | — | Individual developers, growing teams and large enterprises that run AI coding agents and need security teams to govern them |
Plans side by side
Concourse CI
Pricing not available.
Docker
Docker Personal$0per user/month
Docker Pro$11per user/month
Docker Team$16per user/month
Docker Business$24per user/month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Concourse CI
- No licensing fees when self-hosted
Docker
- Broad support for Docker and Kubernetes workflows
- Reliable for containerized, Docker-based workflows
- Docker layer caching
- Extra storage fees for Docker layers and images
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concourse CI vs Docker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concourse-ci-vs-docker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.