Skip to content
SlateIndex
Concourse CIConcourse is an open-source continuous thing-doer.
vs
HarnessAI Platform for the Autonomous SDLC
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3

Concourse CI vs Harness

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Harness is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 12.3 versus 0.6 for Concourse CI.

Choose Concourse CI if…

  • No licensing fees when self-hosted

Choose Harness if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (12.3 vs 0.6)
  • You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or FedRAMP 20x Class A or GDPR coverage
  • Strong enterprise release governance
  • Deployment safety and automated rollback

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Concourse CI Harness
Visibility score0.6%12.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in CI/CD#30#11
Share of voice0.2%3.7%
Mentions this run123
Positive in AI answers—52%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Concourse CI 1%

Concourse CI 0pp · Harness 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Harness leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
16.9%
AI Mode
1.7%
6.1%
Perplexity
0%
13.9%
Concourse CIHarness

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Concourse CI ranked higher
0Harness ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionConcourse CIHarness
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—Contact sales
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentDistributed as a single concourse binary, easy to run almost anywhere, especially with Docker.Harness platform with a Harness Delegate that runs inside the customer's VPC or cluster; a self-managed platform is available as an Enterprise add-on.
Integrations—40+
Compliance—SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP 20x Class A, GDPR
Support—Standard support with a dedicated customer success manager (Essentials), Premier support and dedicated account manager (Enterprise), Community support (Free plan), Professional Services as an add-on
Founded—2017
Headquarters—San Francisco, California, United States
Employees—1,001–5,000
Funding—Series E · $570M raised
Best for—Enterprise engineering and platform teams that want CI, CD, security and cost controls on one governed platform.

Plans side by side

Concourse CI

Pricing not available.

Harness

Free Plan$0not stated
Essentials PlanCustomnot stated
Enterprise PlanCustomnot stated
Harness pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Concourse CI

  • No licensing fees when self-hosted

    Harness

    • Strong enterprise release governance
    • Deployment safety and automated rollback
    • Deployment verification and progressive delivery
    • AI-driven pipeline optimization
    • Analyst recognition as a strong continuous delivery vendor

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concourse CI vs Harness”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concourse-ci-vs-harness, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.