Conga CLM vs Upland Qvidian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Conga CLM is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 7.3 versus 1 for Upland Qvidian, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Conga CLM if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.3 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or HIPAA or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework coverage
- Enterprise-grade document generation, CPQ, and contract lifecycle management
Choose Upland Qvidian if…
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Conga CLM | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.3% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #13 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 2.5% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Conga CLM 0pp · Upland Qvidian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Conga CLM leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Conga CLM | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #4 | #10 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #8 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Conga CLM | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Flexible deployment options | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, HIPAA, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework | SOC 2 Type II |
| Founded | 2006 | — |
| Headquarters | Houston, Texas, United States | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Venture round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures | Series B · $31M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises and high-growth businesses whose commercial complexity across sales, legal, finance and IT is high. | Sales teams that respond to RFPs and build sales proposals |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Conga CLM
- Enterprise-grade document generation, CPQ, and contract lifecycle management
- Deep integration with CRM ecosystems and Salesforce
- Suited to complex sales cycles and complex, multi-layered agreement workflows
- Stronger choice for broader contract and agreement management
- Proposal generation integrated with broader CRM and document workflows
Upland Qvidian
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Conga CLM vs Upland Qvidian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/conga-clm-vs-upland-qvidian, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.