Skip to content
SlateIndex
ContractSafeEasy, AI-powered contract management software
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

ContractSafe vs Qwilr

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 1.4 for ContractSafe, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose ContractSafe if…

  • You need ISO 27001 or HIPAA or GDPR or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat

Choose Qwilr if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 1.4)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 50% positive)
  • You need PCI-DSS coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric ContractSafe Qwilr
Visibility score1.4%28.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#34#4
Share of voice0.4%7.2%
Mentions this run237
Positive in AI answers50%51%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2ContractSafe 1%

ContractSafe 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
4.1%
30.2%
AI Mode
0%
26.9%
Perplexity
0%
27.8%
ContractSafeQwilr

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1ContractSafe ranked higher
1Qwilr ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionContractSafeQwilr
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceContact sales$35 per seat / mo
Free planNoNo · 14-day trial
Onboarding feeIncluded—
DeploymentCloud-hosted on Amazon Web Services, with data residency in the US, EU, Canada or AustraliaWeb-based, web-native software
Integrations6+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, TX-RAMP Level 2SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS
Support24/5 support, Email, chat and phone support, Robust help center, Dedicated customer success managerEmail support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions
Founded20152014
HeadquartersMalibu, CaliforniaRedfern, New South Wales, Australia
Employees51–20051–200
FundingGrowth investment from Five Elms Capital · $28M raisedSeries A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised
Best forGrowing organizations, most often 50 to 1,000 people, where one person such as a general counsel, finance lead, or contracts, compliance or procurement manager owns the contracts and everyone else needs to find, track and sign themSales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement.

Plans side by side

ContractSafe

OrganizeCustommonth, prepaid annually; based on contract volume
FinalizeCustommonth, prepaid annually; based on contract volume
MaximizeCustommonth, prepaid annually; based on contract volume
ContractSafe pricing

Qwilr

Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Qwilr pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

ContractSafe

Profile in progress.

Qwilr

  • Interactive, web-based proposals
  • Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
  • Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
  • Lower cost with annual billing
  • 14-day free trial available

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “ContractSafe vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/contractsafe-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.