CrelateThe Strategic Recruiting Platform
vs
Spark HireHiring software for lean teams
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Crelate vs Spark Hire
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Crelate is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 2.6 versus 2.6 for Spark Hire.
Choose Crelate if…
- You want a lower entry price ($85 vs $335)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or CCPA coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Spark Hire if…
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 80+)
- You need EEO compliance coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Recommended as best overall for lean or early-stage startups
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Crelate | Spark Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #31 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Crelate 0pp · Spark Hire 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Crelate leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CrelateSpark Hire
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Crelate ranked higher
0Spark Hire ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Crelate | Spark Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $85 per seat / mo | $335 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted multi-tenant SaaS running on Microsoft Azure | — |
| Integrations | 80+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEO compliance |
| Support | Self-service help center and Crelate Academy, Daily training webinars, Live-chat support, Call-back phone support | 24x6 support at no charge, Live training and onboarding, Dedicated customer success team |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Eagle, Idaho, United States | Highland Park, Illinois, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B (strategic investment from Five Elms Capital) · $12M raised | Venture round with Stage 2 Capital as an investor |
| Best for | Executive search, direct placement and in-house talent teams that want one platform for ATS, recruiting CRM and sourcing. | Small and medium organizations of about 50 to 500 employees with lean HR or talent acquisition teams |
Plans side by side
Crelate
Essentials$85per user / month, paid annually
Business$119per user / month, billed annually or monthly
Business PlusCustomper user, paid annually
PlatformCustomUser or site license pricing
Spark Hire
Recruit Pro$335month, billed annually
Recruit Growth$499month, billed annually
Recruit EnterpriseCustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Crelate
Profile in progress.
Spark Hire
- Recommended as best overall for lean or early-stage startups
- ATS plans require annual contracts
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Crelate vs Spark Hire”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/crelate-vs-spark-hire, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.