Crelate vs Greenhouse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 2.6 for Crelate, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Crelate if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type II or CCPA coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 2.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Crelate | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.6% | 38.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #31 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 8.1% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 43 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Crelate 0pp · Greenhouse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Crelate | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #27 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Crelate | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $85 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted multi-tenant SaaS running on Microsoft Azure | — |
| Integrations | 80+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS |
| Support | Self-service help center and Crelate Academy, Daily training webinars, Live-chat support, Call-back phone support | — |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Eagle, Idaho, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series B (strategic investment from Five Elms Capital) · $12M raised | Series D · $110M raised |
| Best for | Executive search, direct placement and in-house talent teams that want one platform for ATS, recruiting CRM and sourcing. | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises |
Plans side by side
Crelate
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Crelate
Profile in progress.
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Crelate vs Greenhouse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/crelate-vs-greenhouse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.