Skip to content
SlateIndex
Spark HireHiring software for lean teams
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Spark Hire vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 2.6 for Spark Hire, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Spark Hire if…

  • You need GDPR or EEO compliance coverage
  • Recommended as best overall for lean or early-stage startups

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 2.6)
  • You want a lower entry price ($299 vs $335)
  • You need more native integrations (270+ vs 100+)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 3 coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Spark Hire Workable
Visibility score2.6%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#32#2
Share of voice0.6%7.2%
Mentions this run338
Positive in AI answers—44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Spark Hire 3%

Spark Hire 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.1%
34.1%
AI Mode
3.7%
29.4%
Perplexity
0.9%
26.7%
Spark HireWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1Spark Hire ranked higher
1Workable ranked higher
PromptEngineSpark HireWorkable
Best recruiting platform for startups AI Mode#1#2
Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? Perplexity#12#6

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionSpark HireWorkable
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry price$335 / mo$299 / mo
Free planNoNo · 15-day trial
Deployment—Cloud-based SaaS
Integrations100+270+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEO complianceISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
Support24x6 support at no charge, Live training and onboarding, Dedicated customer success teamPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20102012
HeadquartersHighland Park, Illinois, USABoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees51–200201–500
FundingVenture round with Stage 2 Capital as an investorSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forSmall and medium organizations of about 50 to 500 employees with lean HR or talent acquisition teamsCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

Spark Hire

Recruit Pro$335month, billed annually
Recruit Growth$499month, billed annually
Recruit EnterpriseCustom
Spark Hire pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Spark Hire

  • Recommended as best overall for lean or early-stage startups
  • ATS plans require annual contracts

Workable

  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
  • transparent pricing and free trial
  • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
  • candidate sourcing
  • costs more than lightweight ATS options

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Spark Hire vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/spark-hire-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.