Skip to content
SlateIndex
CursorAI Coding Agent for Building Ambitious Software
vs
ReplitDescribe what you want. Replit builds it.
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Cursor vs Replit

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 6.9 for Replit, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Cursor if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 6.9)
  • You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing

Choose Replit if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (69% vs 53% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 coverage
  • Browser-based development with no local setup needed
  • Replit Agent builds and deploys apps quickly from prompts

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Cursor Replit
Visibility score67.7%6.9%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#2#14
Share of voice13.6%3.3%
Mentions this run6516
Positive in AI answers53%69%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Cursor 68%

Cursor 0pp · Replit 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
78.7%
4.4%
AI Mode
73.5%
7.4%
Perplexity
50.9%
8.9%
CursorReplit

Head to head in AI answers

16 engine answers name both brands

16Cursor ranked higher
0Replit ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCursorReplit
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—Free; paid from $20 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentDesktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agentsHosted cloud service, with Bring Your Own Cloud and single-tenant options for enterprise customers.
Integrations—450+
ComplianceAIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type IISOC 2
SupportCustomer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise planIn-app help via the ? icon, Premium support on the Pro plan, Dedicated premium support on the Enterprise plan
Founded—2016
Headquarters—Foster City, California, US
Employees501–1,000201–500
FundingFunding round at $9.9B valuationSeries D
Best forIndividual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls.Founders, product managers and non-programmers who want to turn ideas into apps, and commercial teams building professional apps on the Pro plan.

Plans side by side

Cursor

Pricing not available.

Replit

Core$20month, $18/month billed annually
Pro$100month, $90/month billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom, contact sales
Replit pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Cursor

  • Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
  • High user satisfaction and momentum
  • Top overall pick for professional developers
  • Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
  • Free tier to try it
  • Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
  • Free Hobby plan has limited usage

Replit

  • Browser-based development with no local setup needed
  • Replit Agent builds and deploys apps quickly from prompts
  • Well suited to rapid prototyping
  • Beginner-friendly environment
  • Free tier with cloud environment and built-in AI assistance

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Cursor vs Replit”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cursor-vs-replit, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.