CyberArk vs IBM Verify
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 4.2 for IBM Verify, and ranks ahead in 80% of the answers that name both.
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 4.2)
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 8% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
Choose IBM Verify if…
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Strong enterprise feature set and compliance management
- Enterprise identity capabilities for complex, regulated environments
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | CyberArk | IBM Verify |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.6% | 4.2% |
| Change vs last week | up+2.1% | up+3.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #7 | #21 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 49% | 8% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
CyberArk +0.5pp · IBM Verify +1.8000000000000003pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
10 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | CyberArk | IBM Verify |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Self-hosted and SaaS | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2, SOC 3, HIPAA, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community | — |
| Founded | 1999 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Newton, MA, United States | Armonk, New York, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Post-IPO debt | — |
| Best for | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. | Large organizations that need enterprise-scale identity security |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
IBM Verify
- Strong enterprise feature set and compliance management
- Enterprise identity capabilities for complex, regulated environments
- Risk-based analytics and compliance
- Frequently recommended for large enterprises
- Recognized as a leader in access and customer IAM evaluations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “CyberArk vs IBM Verify”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/cyberark-vs-ibm-verify, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.