DataRobotThe platform enterprises trust to build, operate, and govern their agents.
vs
MastraTypeScript AI Framework for Agents and Apps
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
DataRobot vs Mastra
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
DataRobot is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 1.2 for Mastra.
Choose DataRobot if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Automated machine learning (AutoML) capabilities
Choose Mastra if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 27% positive)
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | DataRobot | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #55 | #56 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 27% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
DataRobot 0pp · Mastra 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
DataRobot leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DataRobotMastra
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0DataRobot ranked higher
0Mastra ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | DataRobot | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $250 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, hybrid, on-premises, and air-gapped environments | Self-hosted on any Node.js-compatible environment, or hosted on Mastra Cloud and Mastra Platform. |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA | — |
| Support | Online documentation, Support center | Shared Slack support channel (Enterprise), Dedicated support engineer (Enterprise), SLA support 8-5 Monday-Friday, 8am-6pm PST |
| Founded | 2012 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, USA | San Francisco |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Corporate minority round (SBI Holdings) | Series A · $35M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises in regulated industries that need to take agentic AI from pilot into production. | Developers and teams building AI agents in TypeScript and JavaScript |
Plans side by side
DataRobot
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
DataRobot
- Automated machine learning (AutoML) capabilities
- Robust enterprise monitoring and governance features
- Good fit for governed AutoML in regulated industries
- Analyst-friendly workflows for business users
- Free trial available
- Steep platform fees that scale aggressively
Mastra
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “DataRobot vs Mastra”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/datarobot-vs-mastra, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.