MastraTypeScript AI Framework for Agents and Apps
vs
n8nFlexible AI workflow automation for technical teams.
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Mastra vs n8n
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
n8n is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 22 versus 1.2 for Mastra, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose Mastra if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 57% positive)
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
Choose n8n if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (22 vs 1.2)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Mastra | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 22% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #56 | #5 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 4.4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 30 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Mastra 0pp · n8n 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
n8n leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Mastran8n
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
1Mastra ranked higher
2n8n ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Mastra | n8n |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI Agents tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #12 | #7 |
| Compare the leading AI Agents platforms | Perplexity | #22 | #10 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI agent platform | AI Mode | #5 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Mastra | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $250 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted on any Node.js-compatible environment, or hosted on Mastra Cloud and Mastra Platform. | Hosted on n8n Cloud or self-hosted on-prem or with Docker. |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Shared Slack support channel (Enterprise), Dedicated support engineer (Enterprise), SLA support 8-5 Monday-Friday, 8am-6pm PST | Forum support on all plans, Email support on Enterprise, Dedicated support with SLA on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2024 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A · $35M raised | Series C · $240M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams building AI agents in TypeScript and JavaScript | Technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. |
Plans side by side
n8n
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Mastra
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
n8n
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
- Broad integrations across SaaS apps and APIs
- Free self-hosted edition and affordable cloud plans
- Self-hosting requires technical skill such as Docker or server management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Mastra vs n8n”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/mastra-vs-n8n, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.