Mastra alternatives: top competitors compared
Mastra has a visibility score of 1.2 in AI Agents, #56 of 80. AI answers that name Mastra most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LangGraph | Teams building long-running, stateful AI agents. | — | 24.4% | — |
| n8n | Technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. | — | 22% | Combines AI capabilities with business process automation in one workflow platform. |
| CrewAI | Enabling business and technical teams to build agents while giving platform teams the control to govern them. | Contact sales | 17.5% | A unified build and runtime platform that is centrally governed. |
| Salesforce | Businesses from small companies to large enterprises wanting sales, service, marketing and commerce on one CRM platform | — | 46.2% | One unified platform combining CRM apps, data, and AI agents |
LangGraph
LangGraph suits teams building long-running, stateful AI agents..
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 24.4% visibility score · #4 in AI Agents
Key features
- LangGraph — Low-level orchestration framework and runtime for building, managing and deploying long-running, stateful agents.
- Deep Agents — Agent harness built on top of LangGraph.
- LangSmith Deployment — Managed deployment service for LangGraph agents, with paid tiers.
LangGraph vs Mastra
| Dimension | LangGraph | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 24.4% | 1.2% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $250 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Trial | — | Free plan available |
Pros
- Production standard for stateful, multi-agent workflows
- Strong engineering control for complex, cyclical agent logic
- Widely adopted open-source developer framework
- Best choice for autonomous AI agents
Cons
- Heavy developer framework that requires coding effort
n8n
n8n suits technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code..
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 22% visibility score · #5 in AI Agents
- 2000+ native integrations
Key features
- n8n — Workflow automation platform with a visual builder, AI agents, MCP support and code steps in JavaScript or Python.
- n8n Community Edition — Standard self-hosted version of n8n, available on GitHub.
n8n vs Mastra
| Dimension | n8n | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 22% | 1.2% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $250 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Trial | — | Free plan available |
Pros
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
- Broad integrations across SaaS apps and APIs
- Free self-hosted edition and affordable cloud plans
Cons
- Self-hosting requires technical skill such as Docker or server management
CrewAI
CrewAI suits enabling business and technical teams to build agents while giving platform teams the control to govern them..
Quick facts
- Contact sales · flat tiers
- Free plan available
- 17.5% visibility score · #7 in AI Agents
- 1000+ native integrations
Key features
- CrewAI AMP — Enterprise Agent Management Platform for building, orchestrating, deploying and managing agents and multi-agent workflows, formerly AOP.
- CrewAI Studio — No-code visual builder with a natural-language assistant that produces Flows exportable as code.
- CrewAI open-source framework — MIT-licensed multi-agent framework on which AMP is built.
- CrewAI Discovery — Engine that flags automation use cases from production agent data.
CrewAI vs Mastra
| Dimension | CrewAI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.5% | 1.2% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $250 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Trial | Free plan available | Free plan available |
Pros
- Fastest path to a working multi-agent demo
- Strong for complex multi-agent and role-based workflows
- Free open-source Python framework
- Good for quickly prototyping multi-agent systems
- Industry standard for pro-code multi-agent orchestration
Cons
- Better suited to developers than nontechnical users
Salesforce
Salesforce suits businesses from small companies to large enterprises wanting sales, service, marketing and commerce on one CRM platform.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 46.2% visibility score · #1 in Field Service Management
Key features
- Agentforce — Platform for building, deploying and running AI agents for customers and employees.
- Sales Cloud — Sales pipeline, forecasting and sales process management.
- Service Cloud — Customer support case management across channels.
- Marketing Cloud — Building and personalizing campaigns and customer journeys.
Salesforce vs Mastra
| Dimension | Salesforce | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 46.2% | 1.2% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $250 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Trial | — | Free plan available |
Pros
- Powerful reporting, automation and customisation
- Market leader and gold standard CRM
- Deep ecosystem and strong CRM integrations
- Built for large enterprises and scaling
- Free trial to test its features
Cons
- Requires a dedicated administrator to manage
- High enterprise pricing
- Heavy, slow implementation that suits large budgets
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Mastra | Flat tiers | Free; paid from $250 / mo |
| LangGraph | — | — |
| n8n | — | — |
| CrewAI | Flat tiers | Contact sales |
| Salesforce | — | — |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Mastra in the latest weekly run.