DelineaStop unauthorized access.
vs
OmadaA Leader In Identity Governance and Administration
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Delinea vs Omada
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Omada is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 0.6 versus 0.5 for Delinea, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Delinea if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (22% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or SOC 1 Type 2 or FedRAMP High (Secret Server) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Strong candidate for privileged access management
Choose Omada if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.6 vs 0.5)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Delinea | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.1% | up+0.6% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #35 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 22% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Delinea −1.2pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Omada leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DelineaOmada
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Delinea ranked higher
2Omada ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Delinea | Omada |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a identity and access management platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #12 | #9 |
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #12 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Delinea | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud-native platform; hybrid and on-premises environments supported | SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, SOC 1 Type 2, FedRAMP High (Secret Server) | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Technical support, Professional services, Customer success, User training | Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services |
| Founded | 2021 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Private equity | Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital) |
| Best for | Enterprises needing privileged access management and governance across hybrid and multi-cloud environments | Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Delinea
- Strong candidate for privileged access management
- Recognised by ISG as Innovative
- Covers privileged and secrets management
Omada
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Delinea vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/delinea-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.