DescopeDrag & drop customer and agentic IAM for apps, AI agents and MCP servers.
vs
Google Cloud IAMFine-grained authorization across Google Cloud
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Descope vs Google Cloud IAM
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Descope is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0.9 for Google Cloud IAM.
Choose Descope if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0.9)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or HIPAA or FedRAMP High coverage
- Low-code option
- High user ratings (4.8/5) in a narrow category
Choose Google Cloud IAM if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Suitable for controlling permissions on cloud resources
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Descope | Google Cloud IAM |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 0.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−3% | New |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #26 | #31 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 62% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Descope −2pp · Google Cloud IAM +0.9pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Descope leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
DescopeGoogle Cloud IAM
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Descope ranked higher
0Google Cloud IAM ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Descope | Google Cloud IAM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $249 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS | Built into Google Cloud, with policies managed through the Console or CLI. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA, FedRAMP High | — |
| Support | Community support, Web and email support, Slack support, Dedicated CS engineer | — |
| Founded | 2022 | — |
| Headquarters | Los Altos, California, United States | Mountain View, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Seed extension · $88M raised | — |
| Best for | Startups, SaaS companies and enterprises adding customer auth, B2B SSO/SCIM, or identity for AI agents and MCP servers. | Teams that need to control access to Google Cloud resources at a fine-grained level. |
Plans side by side
Descope
Free Forever$0month
Pro$249month, billed annually
Growth$799month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustom
Google Cloud IAM
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Descope
- Low-code option
- High user ratings (4.8/5) in a narrow category
- Robust developer-focused free tier with built-in MFA
- Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder that is easy to use
Google Cloud IAM
- Suitable for controlling permissions on cloud resources
- Not a complete workforce IAM strategy on its own
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Descope vs Google Cloud IAM”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/descope-vs-google-cloud-iam, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.