Devin vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Devin is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 16.9 versus 7.7 for Sourcegraph Cody, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Devin if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.9 vs 7.7)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (12% vs 0% positive)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Free trial available for 30 days
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Devin | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16.9% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #5 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 6.1% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 29 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 12% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Devin 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Devin leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Devin | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | AI Mode | #2 | #7 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | Perplexity | #9 | #14 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | AI Mode | #4 | #7 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | Perplexity | #8 | #15 |
| Most affordable AI coding assistant that is still reliable | Perplexity | #2 | #7 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | AI Mode | #8 | #10 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | Perplexity | #9 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Devin | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $20 / mo | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud agent at app.devin.ai and a local CLI, with dedicated VPC deployment on Enterprise plans | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Priority support on Team plan, Dedicated Slack Connect channel for support, Dedicated account and engineering support on Enterprise plan, Optional onboarding call | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series E · $3700M raised | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | Engineering teams that want to hand well-scoped coding, testing and maintenance tasks to parallel AI agents | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
Devin
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Devin
- Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
- Best value agentic editor
- Fully autonomous software engineering
- Acts as a collaborative partner with parallel flows and self-correction
- Multi-file edits and deep context across large directories
- Fit depends on governance and workflow requirements
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Devin vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/devin-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.