Skip to content
SlateIndex
DevinThe autonomous software engineer
vs
Sourcegraph CodyThe enterprise coding assistant to understand, fix, and automate your code
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Devin vs Sourcegraph Cody

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Devin is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 16.9 versus 7.7 for Sourcegraph Cody, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Devin if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.9 vs 7.7)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (12% vs 0% positive)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat

Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Free trial available for 30 days

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Devin Sourcegraph Cody
Visibility score16.9%7.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#5#12
Share of voice6.1%3.3%
Mentions this run2916
Positive in AI answers12%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Devin 17%

Devin 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Devin leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
18.1%
0.9%
AI Mode
23.1%
5.2%
Perplexity
9.4%
17%
DevinSourcegraph Cody

Head to head in AI answers

7 engine answers name both brands

7Devin ranked higher
0Sourcegraph Cody ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionDevinSourcegraph Cody
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $20 / mo$16,000 per seat / mo
Free planYesNo
DeploymentCloud agent at app.devin.ai and a local CLI, with dedicated VPC deployment on Enterprise plansSingle-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001
SupportPriority support on Team plan, Dedicated Slack Connect channel for support, Dedicated account and engineering support on Enterprise plan, Optional onboarding call24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support
HeadquartersSan FranciscoSan Francisco, California, US
Employees—51–200
FundingSeries E · $3700M raisedLater-stage deal · $225M raised
Best forEngineering teams that want to hand well-scoped coding, testing and maintenance tasks to parallel AI agentsEnterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases

Plans side by side

Devin

Free$0month
Pro$20month
Max$200month
Teams$80month for team plan, plus $40/mo per full dev seat
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Devin pricing

Sourcegraph Cody

Enterprise$16,000year, minimum annual contract (starting at)
Sourcegraph Cody pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Devin

  • Robust free tier with unlimited autocomplete
  • Best value agentic editor
  • Fully autonomous software engineering
  • Acts as a collaborative partner with parallel flows and self-correction
  • Multi-file edits and deep context across large directories
  • Fit depends on governance and workflow requirements

Sourcegraph Cody

  • Free trial available for 30 days
  • Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Devin vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/devin-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.