FetcherThe best talent, fetched for you
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Fetcher vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 1.2 for Fetcher.
Choose Fetcher if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 44% positive)
- Advertised high discount percentage
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 1.2)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- fast deployment and ease of use
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Fetcher | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #51 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Fetcher 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
FetcherWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Fetcher ranked higher
0Workable ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Fetcher | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 270+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Email support | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY, US | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Talent acquisition and recruiting teams that want AI sourcing with human review of each candidate batch | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Fetcher
Pricing not available.
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Fetcher
- Advertised high discount percentage
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Fetcher vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/fetcher-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.