GetAccept vs Icertis
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GetAccept is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 15.7 versus 3.3 for Icertis, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose GetAccept if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.7 vs 3.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (43% vs 40% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or CCPA or eIDAS (AdES, QES) coverage
- All-in-one proposal and e-signature tool with document tracking
Choose Icertis if…
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | GetAccept | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15.7% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #8 | #23 |
| Share of voice | 4.8% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 26 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 43% | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GetAccept 0pp · Icertis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GetAccept leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | GetAccept | Icertis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best proposal and contract tool for enterprise | ChatGPT | #8 | #7 |
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | ChatGPT | #4 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GetAccept | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $25 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS | Public or private cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, CCPA, eIDAS (AdES, QES) | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA |
| Support | Help center and chat support (06:00–00:00 UTC), Dedicated customer success manager (add-on) | — |
| Founded | 2015 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, United States | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series B, led by Bessemer Venture Partners | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt |
| Best for | B2B sales teams: smaller teams that need e-signature, and larger teams scaling complex sales processes on the AI-native plan | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts |
Plans side by side
GetAccept
Icertis
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GetAccept
- All-in-one proposal and e-signature tool with document tracking
- Strong interactive deal rooms and sales-room features
- Good fit for heavier sales-enablement needs
- Suited to multi-stakeholder B2B SaaS deals
- Strong buyer engagement and analytics for CRM-centred sales
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GetAccept vs Icertis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/getaccept-vs-icertis, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.