DocuSign vs Icertis
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
DocuSign is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 21.9 versus 3.3 for Icertis, and ranks ahead in 60% of the answers that name both.
Choose DocuSign if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (21.9 vs 3.3)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or PCI DSS or CSA STAR or APEC PPP or SSAE 18 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Strong integration with enterprise tools
Choose Icertis if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (40% vs 34% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or GDPR or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | DocuSign | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 21.9% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #6 | #23 |
| Share of voice | 6.2% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 33 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 34% | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
DocuSign 0pp · Icertis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
DocuSign leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | DocuSign | Icertis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best proposal and contract tool for enterprise | ChatGPT | #3 | #7 |
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | ChatGPT | #6 | #9 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #7 | #1 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #8 | #2 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | ChatGPT | #8 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | DocuSign | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $11 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | — | Public or private cloud |
| Integrations | 1000+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, FedRAMP, CSA STAR, APEC PPP, SSAE 18 | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA |
| Support | 24/7 live technical support on Enhanced plans, Docusign Support portal | — |
| Founded | 2003 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Initial public offering · $500M raised | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt |
| Best for | Individuals and small to medium teams that need e-signature, and enterprises that need centralized agreement management with IAM. | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts |
Plans side by side
DocuSign
Icertis
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
DocuSign
- Strong integration with enterprise tools
- Recommended as best enterprise agreement infrastructure via DocuSign CLM
- Best-known choice for electronic signatures
- Large customer base and wide worldwide use
- Good fit for organisations already invested in DocuSign
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “DocuSign vs Icertis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/docusign-vs-icertis, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.