Skip to content
SlateIndex
DocuSignBringing Agreements to Life
vs
IcertisAI-native contract intelligence
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

DocuSign vs Icertis

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

DocuSign is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 21.9 versus 3.3 for Icertis, and ranks ahead in 60% of the answers that name both.

Choose DocuSign if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (21.9 vs 3.3)
  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or PCI DSS or CSA STAR or APEC PPP or SSAE 18 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
  • Strong integration with enterprise tools

Choose Icertis if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (40% vs 34% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or GDPR or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
  • Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
  • Handles complex commercial management

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric DocuSign Icertis
Visibility score21.9%3.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#6#23
Share of voice6.2%0.9%
Mentions this run335
Positive in AI answers34%40%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2DocuSign 22%

DocuSign 0pp · Icertis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

DocuSign leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
35.7%
6.7%
AI Mode
13.7%
3.1%
Perplexity
16.3%
0%
DocuSignIcertis

Head to head in AI answers

5 engine answers name both brands

3DocuSign ranked higher
2Icertis ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionDocuSignIcertis
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry price$11 per seat / mo—
Free planNo—
Deployment—Public or private cloud
Integrations1000+—
ComplianceISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, FedRAMP, CSA STAR, APEC PPP, SSAE 18SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA
Support24/7 live technical support on Enhanced plans, Docusign Support portal—
Founded20032009
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesBellevue, WA, United States
Employees5,000+1,001–5,000
FundingInitial public offering · $500M raisedRound from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt
Best forIndividuals and small to medium teams that need e-signature, and enterprises that need centralized agreement management with IAM.Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts

Plans side by side

DocuSign

Personal$11month, billed annually
Standard$30user/month, billed annually
Business Pro$45user/month, billed annually
Enhanced plansCustomcontact sales
DocuSign pricing

Icertis

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

DocuSign

  • Strong integration with enterprise tools
  • Recommended as best enterprise agreement infrastructure via DocuSign CLM
  • Best-known choice for electronic signatures
  • Large customer base and wide worldwide use
  • Good fit for organisations already invested in DocuSign

    Icertis

    • Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
    • Handles complex commercial management
    • Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
    • Suited to large multinational enterprises

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “DocuSign vs Icertis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/docusign-vs-icertis, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.