GitBookThe knowledge layer for AI
vs
MakeAI automation you can visually build and orchestrate in real time.
Comparison · Knowledge Management · weekly run Nov 3
GitBook vs Make
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Make is the stronger AI pick in Knowledge Management: it has a visibility score of 14.4 versus 4.6 for GitBook, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose GitBook if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 41% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- Free tier for individuals and small open-source or developer documentation teams
- Suited to polished external technical and API documentation
Choose Make if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.4 vs 4.6)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | GitBook | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.6% | 14.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Knowledge Management | #18 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 2.2% | 3.1% |
| Mentions this run | 12 | 17 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 41% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GitBook 0pp · Make 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Make leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GitBookMake
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0GitBook ranked higher
1Make ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | GitBook | Make |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Knowledge Management tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #11 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GitBook | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $65 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS |
| Integrations | — | 3500+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 |
| Support | White-glove migration, 1:1 support and training, Custom integrations | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Covina, California, US | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Secondary transaction | — |
| Best for | Technical, product and support teams that publish docs for users and AI agents and need them kept accurate. | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. |
Plans side by side
GitBook
Free$0per site/month
Essential$65per site/month plus $12 per user/month, billed annually
Ultimate$249per site/month plus $12 per user/month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomCustom
Make
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GitBook
- Free tier for individuals and small open-source or developer documentation teams
- Suited to polished external technical and API documentation
- Good for deflecting support tickets and organising product documentation
- Pairs well with Notion or Slite for internal knowledge in developer-led startups
- Named among the strongest shortlisted documentation tools
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GitBook vs Make”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/gitbook-vs-make, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.