GitHubThe home of software development
vs
HarvestEveryone's time is valuable. We help teams spend it wisely.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
GitHub vs Harvest
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 10.2 versus 2.7 for Harvest, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.2 vs 2.7)
- You want a lower entry price ($4 vs $9)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or CSA STAR Level 2 or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Tailored ATO coverage
Choose Harvest if…
- You need PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | GitHub | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.2% | 2.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #10 | #29 |
| Share of voice | 2.6% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GitHub 0pp · Harvest 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GitHubHarvest
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
3GitHub ranked higher
0Harvest ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | GitHub | Harvest |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | ChatGPT | #2 | #6 |
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | AI Mode | #3 | #5 |
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | Perplexity | #1 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GitHub | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server | — |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO | PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) | Help Center, Scheduled phone support on Teams and Enterprise plans, Dedicated Customer Success Manager on Enterprise Plus |
| Founded | 2008 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | — |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | — |
| Funding | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised | Seed |
| Best for | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. | Freelancers and professional services teams that bill clients by the hour, from solo users to larger teams. |
Plans side by side
Harvest
Free$0forever, 1 seat
Teams$9per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise$14per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise PlusCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Harvest
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GitHub vs Harvest”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/github-vs-harvest, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.