AsanaWork & Project Management for Human-Agent Teams
vs
HarvestEveryone's time is valuable. We help teams spend it wisely.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Asana vs Harvest
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Asana is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 60.9 versus 2.7 for Harvest, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Asana if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.9 vs 2.7)
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 40+)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) coverage
- Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking
Choose Harvest if…
- You want a lower entry price ($9 vs $10.99)
- You need PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Asana | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 60.9% | 2.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #1 | #29 |
| Share of voice | 11.7% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 64 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Asana 0pp · Harvest 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Asana leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AsanaHarvest
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
0Asana ranked higher
3Harvest ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Asana | Harvest |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | ChatGPT | #10 | #6 |
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | Perplexity | #7 | #4 |
| Which Project Management tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #3 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Asana | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10.99 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | — |
| Integrations | 100+ | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, FedRAMP Moderate (Asana Gov) | PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate |
| Support | Help Center, Community, Asana Academy, Customer Success | Help Center, Scheduled phone support on Teams and Enterprise plans, Dedicated Customer Success Manager on Enterprise Plus |
| Founded | 2008 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | — |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Series E | Seed |
| Best for | Individuals and teams from small groups up to large organizations scaling cross-functional work across departments. | Freelancers and professional services teams that bill clients by the hour, from solo users to larger teams. |
Plans side by side
Asana
Personal$0free forever
Starter$10.99per user per month, billed annually
Advanced$24.99per user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Harvest
Free$0forever, 1 seat
Teams$9per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise$14per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise PlusCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Asana
- Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking
- Easy to adopt and use, with clean design
- Goal tracking and cross-team accountability
- Strongest general-purpose project management choice
- Asana Intelligence summarises status and spots bottlenecks; AI agents for coordination
Harvest
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Asana vs Harvest”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/asana-vs-harvest, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.