Harvest alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside Harvest
GitHubBest forDevelopment teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform.75% of Harvest answersGitLabBest forScaling development teams and enterprises that need advanced security and compliance capabilities75% of Harvest answersAsanaBest forIndividuals and teams from small groups up to large organizations scaling cross-functional work across departments.75% of Harvest answersMakeBest forTeams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide.75% of Harvest answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
Harvest has a visibility score of 2.7 in Project Management, #29 of 65. AI answers that name Harvest most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo | 83.3% | Scale of its developer community, with 225M+ developers and 800M+ repositories, alongside code hosting, CI/CD, and security in one platform. |
| GitLab | Scaling development teams and enterprises that need advanced security and compliance capabilities | Free; paid from $29 per seat / mo | 76.8% | One platform covering planning, source control, CI/CD and security, where policies and approvals apply to human and agent changes alike |
| Asana | Individuals and teams from small groups up to large organizations scaling cross-functional work across departments. | Free; paid from $10.99 per seat / mo | 60.9% | The Work Graph connects every person, task, project, goal and dependency so humans and AI agents share the same context. |
| Make | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. | — | 14.4% | Glass box visibility: every automation and AI agent can be watched as it runs in one live view, with governance controls. |
Alternative 1
GitHub vs Harvest →GitHub
GitHub suits development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform..
Quick facts
- Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo · per seat
- Free plan available
- 83.3% visibility score · #1 in CI/CD
Key features
- GitHub — Repository hosting, code review, and collaboration for source code.
- GitHub Actions — CI/CD and workflow automation for building, testing, and deploying code.
- GitHub Copilot — AI coding assistant and agent for tasks, projects, and automated work.
- GitHub Codespaces — Cloud development environments that open in a browser or editor.
GitHub vs Harvest
| Dimension | GitHub | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 83.3% | 2.7% |
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Trial | Free plan available | Free plan available |
Pros
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Cons
Alternative 2
GitLab vs Harvest →GitLab
GitLab suits scaling development teams and enterprises that need advanced security and compliance capabilities.
Quick facts
- Free; paid from $29 per seat / mo · per seat
- Free plan available
- 76.8% visibility score · #2 in CI/CD
Key features
- GitLab — Source control, CI/CD, issue tracking and security scanning in one DevSecOps platform
- GitLab Duo Agent Platform — AI agents and flows that review code, fix pipelines and run development workflows
- GitLab Orbit — Context graph of the software lifecycle that agents and engineers query, sold in query packs
- GitLab Dedicated — Fully managed single-tenant GitLab with data residency and full data isolation
GitLab vs Harvest
| Dimension | GitLab | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 76.8% | 2.7% |
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $29 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Trial | Free plan available | Free plan available |
Pros
- All-in-one DevSecOps platform
- Integrated security scanning
- Robust built-in CI/CD pipelines
- Free tier for individuals and open-source projects
- High adoption and user ratings
Cons
Alternative 3
Asana vs Harvest →Asana
Asana suits individuals and teams from small groups up to large organizations scaling cross-functional work across departments..
Quick facts
- Free; paid from $10.99 per seat / mo · per seat
- Free plan available
- 60.9% visibility score · #1 in Project Management
- 100+ native integrations
Key features
- Agentic Work Management — Brings AI Teammates, AI Studio, Asana Dash and connectors together so teams and agents run critical workflows on one plan.
- Asana Service Management — AI-native service management for IT, HR, facilities and legal requests.
- Asana Client Management — Client work platform for agencies and teams delivering work for clients.
- Command by Asana — Product management for developer teams, keeping engineers, managers and coding agents on the same context.
Asana vs Harvest
| Dimension | Asana | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 60.9% | 2.7% |
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10.99 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Trial | Free plan available | Free plan available |
Pros
- Strong for cross-functional structured execution and milestone tracking
- Easy to adopt and use, with clean design
- Goal tracking and cross-team accountability
- Strongest general-purpose project management choice
- Asana Intelligence summarises status and spots bottlenecks; AI agents for coordination
Cons
Alternative 4
Make vs Harvest →Make
Make suits teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide..
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 14.4% visibility score · #7 in Knowledge Management
- 3500+ native integrations
Key features
- Make AI Agents — Autonomous agents that are given a goal and tools, work out the steps themselves, and show their reasoning.
- Make AI Workflows — Guided workflows where you set the path and AI handles specific judgement calls.
- Make Automated Workflows — Fully controlled workflows where every step is defined and every run is predictable.
- Make MCP Server — Build and run Make automations from Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini.
Make vs Harvest
| Dimension | Make | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 14.4% | 2.7% |
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Trial | — | Free plan available |
Pros
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Cons
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Harvest | Per seat | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo |
| GitHub | Per seat | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo |
| GitLab | Per seat | Free; paid from $29 per seat / mo |
| Asana | Per seat | Free; paid from $10.99 per seat / mo |
| Make | — | — |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Harvest in the latest weekly run.