GlassboxAI-powered customer intelligence insights for proactive, preventive and secure digital customer experiences.
vs
HockeyStackThe Command Center for B2B Revenue Teams.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Glassbox vs HockeyStack
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Glassbox is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.4 versus 2.1 for HockeyStack.
Choose Glassbox if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.4 vs 2.1)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
Choose HockeyStack if…
- Connects marketing touchpoints to product usage, revenue, and churn data
- Built specifically for B2B SaaS
- Does not require a large data engineering team
- Suited to connecting campaigns to pipeline and closed-won revenue
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Glassbox | HockeyStack |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.4% | 2.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #17 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 83% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Glassbox 0pp · HockeyStack 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Glassbox leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GlassboxHockeyStack
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Glassbox ranked higher
0HockeyStack ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Glassbox | HockeyStack |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud. | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1 | — |
| Support | — | Hands-on support from the customer success team |
| Founded | 2010 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Minority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raised | Round announced April 2026 · $50M raised |
| Best for | Highly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance. | Marketing leaders, GTM operations and sales leaders at B2B companies that need one view of pipeline across marketing and sales data |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Glassbox
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
- Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
- Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
- Highest review rating among established web analytics tools
HockeyStack
- Connects marketing touchpoints to product usage, revenue, and churn data
- Built specifically for B2B SaaS
- Does not require a large data engineering team
- Suited to connecting campaigns to pipeline and closed-won revenue
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glassbox vs HockeyStack”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glassbox-vs-hockeystack, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.