Skip to content
SlateIndex
GlassboxAI-powered customer intelligence insights for proactive, preventive and secure digital customer experiences.
vs
Lucky OrangeLucky Orange gives you heatmaps, session recordings and more, plus Discovery AI to connect them into a direct answer.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2

Glassbox vs Lucky Orange

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Glassbox is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.4 versus 1.4 for Lucky Orange, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Glassbox if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.4 vs 1.4)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 0% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

Choose Lucky Orange if…

  • You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • Best for conversion optimization
  • Basic free tier or trial options
  • Among the strongest-reviewed product analytics tools

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Glassbox Lucky Orange
Visibility score4.4%1.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Web Analytics#17#29
Share of voice1.2%0.4%
Mentions this run62
Positive in AI answers83%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Glassbox 4%

Glassbox 0pp · Lucky Orange 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Glassbox leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
4.8%
4.1%
AI Mode
3.7%
0%
Perplexity
4.6%
0%
GlassboxLucky Orange

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Glassbox ranked higher
0Lucky Orange ranked higher
PromptEngineGlassboxLucky Orange
Which web analytics tool has the best reviews? ChatGPT#1#2

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGlassboxLucky Orange
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—Free; paid from $19 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentSingle-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud.—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1GDPR, CCPA
Founded20102012
HeadquartersLondon, United KingdomOverland Park, Kansas, US
Employees201–50011–50
FundingMinority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raisedSeed
Best forHighly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance.Website owners and teams who want to see why visitors leave and what to fix first.

Plans side by side

Glassbox

Pricing not available.

Lucky Orange

Free$0month
Launch$19month, paid monthly
Build$39month, paid monthly ($32/mo paid annually)
Grow$89month, paid monthly ($72/mo paid annually)
Expand$249month, paid monthly ($199/mo paid annually)
Scale$1,049month, paid monthly ($839/mo paid annually)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Lucky Orange pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Glassbox

  • Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
  • Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
  • Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
  • Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
  • Highest review rating among established web analytics tools

    Lucky Orange

    • Best for conversion optimization
    • Basic free tier or trial options
    • Among the strongest-reviewed product analytics tools

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glassbox vs Lucky Orange”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glassbox-vs-lucky-orange, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.