GlassboxAI-powered customer intelligence insights for proactive, preventive and secure digital customer experiences.
vs
SE RankingSEO software with data you can trust
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Glassbox vs SE Ranking
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Glassbox is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.4 versus 0.7 for SE Ranking.
Choose Glassbox if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.4 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 66% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
Choose SE Ranking if…
- Strong value for agencies and mid-market teams
- Full-stack suite with rank tracking, audits and competitor analysis
- Transparent, published pricing
- Discounts and 14-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Glassbox | SE Ranking |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.4% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #17 | #35 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 83% | 66% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Glassbox 0pp · SE Ranking 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Glassbox leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GlassboxSE Ranking
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Glassbox ranked higher
0SE Ranking ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Glassbox | SE Ranking |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $129 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud. | Cloud-based |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1 | — |
| Support | — | Help Center and Academy resources, Chat and email support, Customer Success support on higher-tier plans, Personalized onboarding on Growth plan |
| Founded | 2010 | — |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | — |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Minority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raised | Growth/VC (lead: Digital Future) |
| Best for | Highly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance. | Agencies and in-house SEO teams |
Plans side by side
Glassbox
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Glassbox
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
- Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
- Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
- Highest review rating among established web analytics tools
SE Ranking
- Strong value for agencies and mid-market teams
- Full-stack suite with rank tracking, audits and competitor analysis
- Transparent, published pricing
- Discounts and 14-day free trial
- Strong user ratings and reviews
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glassbox vs SE Ranking”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glassbox-vs-se-ranking, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.