GleanEnterprise AI that understands your company
vs
TanaYour meetings. Minus the homework.
Comparison · Knowledge Management · weekly run Nov 3
Glean vs Tana
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Glean is the stronger AI pick in Knowledge Management: it has a visibility score of 16.2 versus 1.3 for Tana, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Glean if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.2 vs 1.3)
- You need ISO 42001 or HIPAA or TX-RAMP Level 2 or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Enterprise search across many connected apps
Choose Tana if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR compliant coverage
- powerful node-based outliner
- turns messy notes into structured networked hubs
- advanced AI-powered knowledge management
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Glean | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16.2% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Knowledge Management | #6 | #42 |
| Share of voice | 4.1% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 22 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Glean 0pp · Tana 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Glean leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GleanTana
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Glean ranked higher
0Tana ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Glean | Tana |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best knowledge management tool with AI features | Perplexity | #2 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Glean | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Per-customer search model stored in the customer's VPC | Desktop app for Mac, Windows and Linux, plus web |
| Integrations | 250+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 42001, HIPAA, TX-RAMP Level 2, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR compliant |
| Support | Help Center | FAQ on tana.inc, Designated customer success manager on the Business plan |
| Founded | 2019 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Palo Alto, CA, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Seed or early-stage round (emerged from stealth) · $765M raised | Series A · $25M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises that want AI answers and agents grounded in their own permission-aware company data | AI-native teams whose agents need meeting context |
Plans side by side
Glean
Pricing not available.
Tana
Free$0free forever
Pro$19per member per month, billed monthly
Business$35per member per month, billed yearly (from price)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Glean
- Enterprise search across many connected apps
- Seen as a market leader in enterprise search
- Finds answers and internal experts quickly
- Recommended for enterprise-wide knowledge search
Tana
- powerful node-based outliner
- turns messy notes into structured networked hubs
- advanced AI-powered knowledge management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glean vs Tana”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glean-vs-tana, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.