Tana alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside Tana
NotionBest forIndividuals, small teams, growing businesses and enterprises that want docs, databases and AI agents in one workspace100% of Tana answersMicrosoft SharePoint100% of Tana answersAtlassian Confluence67% of Tana answersGuruBest forOrganizations in regulated or accuracy-sensitive industries that need governed, verified knowledge for both staff and AI tools.67% of Tana answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
Tana has a visibility score of 1.3 in Knowledge Management, #42 of 52. AI answers that name Tana most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notion | Individuals, small teams, growing businesses and enterprises that want docs, databases and AI agents in one workspace | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo | 57.4% | Custom agents and AI run inside the same workspace as your docs and databases |
| Microsoft SharePoint | — | — | 28.6% | Seamless integration with Microsoft 365 apps, according to reviewers |
| Atlassian Confluence | — | — | 53.4% | — |
| Guru | Organizations in regulated or accuracy-sensitive industries that need governed, verified knowledge for both staff and AI tools. | Contact sales | 29.9% | It structures, verifies and continuously improves knowledge before people and AI use it, rather than indexing content as-is. |
Alternative 1
Notion vs Tana →Notion
Notion suits individuals, small teams, growing businesses and enterprises that want docs, databases and AI agents in one workspace.
Quick facts
- Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo · per seat
- Free plan available
- 57.4% visibility score · #1 in Knowledge Management
Key features
- Docs and Wikis — Block-based docs, wikis and teamspaces for notes, specs and company knowledge.
- Databases — Organize projects and tasks with custom properties, subtasks, dependencies, and kanban, timeline and chart views.
- Notion Agent — Personal agent that takes action across your work and connected apps.
- Custom Agents — Always-on agents built for team workflows, billed through Notion credits.
Notion vs Tana
| Dimension | Notion | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 57.4% | 1.3% |
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Trial | Free plan available | Free plan available |
Pros
- flexible all-in-one workspace
- strong for knowledge management and team wikis
- combines docs, databases, and project tracking
- robust free plan for small teams
- high user satisfaction and usability ratings
Cons
Alternative 2
Microsoft SharePoint vs Tana →Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint is ranked #4 in Knowledge Management.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 28.6% visibility score · #4 in Knowledge Management
Key features
- SharePoint Online — Cloud version included with Microsoft 365 and hosted by Microsoft.
- SharePoint Server Subscription Edition — On-premises server edition that runs on the buyer's own servers.
- SharePoint Premium — Document processing add-on that extracts data such as vendor names and addresses from invoices.
Microsoft SharePoint vs Tana
| Dimension | Microsoft SharePoint | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 28.6% | 1.3% |
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Trial | — | Free plan available |
Pros
- Deep integration with Microsoft 365 and Teams
- Best fit for Microsoft-native enterprises
- Major enterprise intranet and document storage platform
- Enterprise-wide AI search with Copilot and Viva
Cons
Alternative 3
Atlassian Confluence vs Tana →Atlassian Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is ranked #2 in Knowledge Management.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 53.4% visibility score · #2 in Knowledge Management
Key features
- Confluence Cloud — Software-as-a-service version of Confluence, hosted and managed by Atlassian.
- Confluence Data Center — Self-hosted version of Confluence, which can run as a single node or as a multi-node cluster behind a load balancer.
- Atlassian Guard — Add-on that adds organization audit logs of user and group changes.
Atlassian Confluence vs Tana
| Dimension | Atlassian Confluence | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 53.4% | 1.3% |
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Trial | — | Free plan available |
Pros
- Industry standard for large-scale enterprise documentation and wikis
- Deep integration with Jira and the Atlassian ecosystem
- Strong fit for engineering and technical teams
- Free plan supports up to 10 users
- Savings of up to 17% when billed annually
Cons
Alternative 4
Guru vs Tana →Guru
Guru suits organizations in regulated or accuracy-sensitive industries that need governed, verified knowledge for both staff and AI tools..
Quick facts
- Contact sales · flat tiers
- 29.9% visibility score · #3 in Knowledge Management
- 100+ native integrations
Key features
- Guru Platform (AI Knowledge Layer) — Structures, verifies and delivers company knowledge, with automated maintenance, verification workflows and 100+ integrations.
- Knowledge Agents — Answer cited, permission-aware questions from governed knowledge inside Slack, Teams, the browser and other AI tools.
- Guru MCP Server — Lets third-party MCP-compatible AI tools and agents pull from the same governed knowledge layer.
- Enterprise Governance — Centralized policy enforcement, permission inheritance, DLP masking, encryption and audit logs across human and AI consumers.
Guru vs Tana
| Dimension | Guru | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 29.9% | 1.3% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Trial | — | Free plan available |
Pros
- Verified, trusted company knowledge
- Answers inside everyday tools like Slack, browser and CRM
- Strong user reviews and peer-review ratings
- AI-powered enterprise search
Cons
- Sales-led, quote-based pricing rather than transparent pricing
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Tana | Per seat | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Notion | Per seat | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Microsoft SharePoint | — | — |
| Atlassian Confluence | — | — |
| Guru | Flat tiers | Contact sales |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Tana in the latest weekly run.